Difference between revisions of "ENZO"
(New page: =ENZO Performance Study Summary= This is a short overview to the performance result of the ENZO application. For each experiment we used these inits/param files: * [http://giusto.nic.uo...) |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Profile of all significant events | |Profile of all significant events | ||
| − | | | + | |1136 |
| − | | | + | |6.0% |
|- | |- | ||
|Profile with Call-path information | |Profile with Call-path information | ||
| − | | | + | |1196 |
| − | | | + | |11.6% |
|- | |- | ||
|Profile of each Phase of execution | |Profile of each Phase of execution | ||
| − | | | + | |1208 |
| − | | | + | |12.7% |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 17:48, 15 May 2008
ENZO Performance Study Summary
This is a short overview to the performance result of the ENZO application. For each experiment we used these inits/param files:
This is a relatively small experiment but was sufficent to generate some interesting performance results. For this study we used the TAU Performance System® to gather information about ENZO's performance, in particular we are interested in the Performance of the AMR simulation at scale. We ran these experiments on NCSA's Intel 64 Linux Cluster (Abe).
TAU Measurement overhead
Here is a short table listing the run-times for various experiments and the instrumentation overhead observed. Each run was on 64 processors (8 nodes).
| Run Type | Runtime (seconds) | Overhead % |
|---|---|---|
| Uninstrumented runtime | 1072 | NA |
| Trace of only MPI event | 1085 | 4.8% |
| Profile of all significant events | 1136 | 6.0% |
| Profile with Call-path information | 1196 | 11.6% |
| Profile of each Phase of execution | 1208 | 12.7% |
